home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
071789
/
07178900.022
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-09-17
|
6KB
|
107 lines
NATION, Page 64Five Political Hot SpotsIn some states the abortion battle is already near boiling point
Abortion is expected to become a fighting issue in almost every
state. But in a handful, it is coming to a head right now:
NEW JERSEY: First Target
Only hours after the Supreme Court's decision inviting states
to enact restrictions on abortion, Democratic Congressman James
Florio, who is running for Governor, announced he would veto any
such legislation if he is elected. His Republican opponent,
Congressman Jim Courter, sought the support of the state's Right
to Life organization in a primary battle against seven adversaries.
But last week Courter began to hedge, asserting that while he would
support restrictions on abortion, he would not lobby the
legislature for them. Courter, mindful that New Jersey is one of
only twelve states that permit Medicaid funding of almost any
abortion, hopes to keep the race focused on other subjects. Says
he: "My priorities are auto insurance and environmental issues and
crime." But the issue he is trying to duck may bite him anyway. The
National Abortion Rights Action League, scenting a favorable
political test, vows to pump as much as $500,000 into campaign ads
to keep the spotlight squarely on abortion. Says N.A.R.A.L.
executive director Kate Michelman: "The New Jersey gubernatorial
race is the first example of what we are going to do around the
country."
MICHIGAN: On to the Ballot Box
Bills to deny Medicaid funding for abortions were vetoed 18
times in 15 years by a succession of Governors before pro-life
forces got such a measure adopted by referendum last year.
Undaunted, Democratic Governor James Blanchard vows to veto any
further restrictions, including those contained in a package of
bills that antiabortionists plan to introduce in the state
legislature when it reconvenes in September. Early betting is that
the bills will pass, but not by margins wide enough to override
vetoes. So the battle eventually will be decided at the ballot box.
Pro-lifers are already talking about starting a petition drive to
force another referendum on any vetoed restrictions. The issue has
split both parties: the staunchly liberal United Auto Workers has
taken no position because of bitter dissension within its ranks,
while pro-choice sentiment is strong in affluent, suburban and
heavily Republican Oakland County, just north of Detroit.
FLORIDA: "It's Going to Be Bloody"
Republican Bob Martinez is the first Governor to announce a
special session of the state legislature to deal with abortion; he
says he will call it sometime before mid-October. One legislator
has already filed a bill mirroring the Missouri law upheld by the
Supreme Court; pro-lifers plan to introduce further measures,
including one allowing fathers to intervene in abortion decisions.
But it is far from certain that any restrictions will be enacted.
A poll in May found that 59% of Florida voters and 51% of state
legislators consider abortion a private matter. Pro-choice
Democrats will try to bottle up restrictive bills in committees,
and if they fail, their allies will argue in court that a 1980
amendment to the state constitution spelling out a right of privacy
applies to abortion. Whatever happens, both sides agree that the
1990 gubernatorial and legislative elections are likely to turn
into a single-issue referendum on abortion. Says Janis
Compton-Carr, director of the Florida Abortion Rights Action
League: "It's going to be bloody."
VIRGINIA: Votes Yes, Money No
Alain Briancon cannot find the time to paint the inside of his
house in Fairfax County because he has to keep answering phone
calls from volunteers who want to work with his wife Maria in the
Virginia Organization to Keep Abortion Legal. But pro-choice
sentiment is frustrated as far as Virginia's gubernatorial race is
concerned. The Republican candidate, former state attorney general
Marshall Coleman, is a strict antiabortionist who says that if he
wins, he will appoint only pro-lifers to health and children's
services positions. His Democratic opponent, Lieutenant Governor
Douglas Wilder, is seeking to become the first black elected to
govern a state, and will not risk alienating moderate voters. So
he has been waffling on abortion, proposing that parental consent
be required for abortions on girls 18 and under and refusing to say
whether he would veto any other restrictions. His indecision will
not cost him pro-choice votes -- "There is no alternative," says
Maria Briancon -- but it may lose him financial support.
Abortion-rights groups are planning to bypass the Virginia race and
pour their money into New Jersey. To the extent that they make a
major effort in Virginia, it will be on behalf of Democrat Don
Beyer, a pro-choice candidate who is running against Republican
Edwina Dalton, an antiabortionist, for Lieutenant Governor.
ILLINOIS: Role-Reversal Time
Republican Governor James Thompson has vetoed antiabortion
legislation. Attorney General Neil Hartigan, the most likely
Democratic candidate to try for Thompson's job next year, has
announced his personal opposition to abortion and, as the state's
top lawyer, is obligated to uphold some restrictions the state did
enact. So which one is angling for the pro-choice vote? Guess
again. Thompson's vetoes were cast on the ground that the
legislation involved was unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade. But
after the Supreme Court's Webster decision last week suggested that
those restrictions might be constitutional after all, the Governor
called for more time to study the ruling. Hartigan went the other
way. Pressured by abortion-rights activists who insisted they would
never "endorse anyone who is not unequivocally for choice and
willing to say so," Hartigan uttered the magic words: "I support
the woman's freedom of choice."